Cops Against Carriers and Commies Against Carbines

First, a look at a recent letter from the Fraternal Order of Police and the International Association of Chiefs of Police to Congress expressing their position against a Concealed Carry Reciprocity law that demands that all 50 States accept permits from all the other states.

Then, another rank, effeminate communist in the Florida legislature has crafted (more like copied and pasted) yet another legislative attempt to strip "assault weapons" from the hands of Floridians.

As you can imagine, Royce has plenty to say about that! 

Freedom Guns
Firearms, Ammunition, Accessories, Training classes

The Gun Site
9-Lane 25 yard indoor Shooting Range, Gun Store, Training classes

SHOOTINGCLASSES.COM
Online business operations platform for firearms instructors, trainees, and Shooting Ranges

Glover Orndorf and Flanagan Wealth Mgmt.
Wealth management services

WJS Guns
Gun and Outdoor Shop, ammo, accessories, fishing tackle, more

Sicarios Gun Shop
Firearms, Accessories, Ammo, Safes, and more!

Counter Strike Tactical
Best Little Gun Store in Melbourne, Florida! Veteran Owned and Operated 321-499-4949

Go2 Weapons
Manufacturers of AR platform rifles for military and civilian. Veteran Owned and Operated

Ear Care of Melbourne
Need hearing aids? Go to the audiologists that gave Royce his hearing back!

Quantified Performance
Quantified Performance, LLC is focused on building safe, high performing keepers and bearers.

Control Jiu-Jitsu/MMA
Jiu-Jitsu/MMA Training in Melbourne, FL

Disclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase, I may receive a commission at no extra cost to you.

Transcript

THIS TRANSCRIPT WAS GENERATED ELECTRONICALLY AND MAY NOT BE AN EXACT WORD-FOR-WORD TEXT, OR GRAMMATICALLY CORRECT. WE APOLOGIZE IN ADVANCE FOR ANY IRREGULARITIES AND/OR MISTAKES.

Freedom Guns is your local gun store for the Rockledge Coco area in Brevard County,
Florida. Stop in and meet Mike and the gang and see the great deals they have on
long guns, handguns, accessories, ammunition, AR build kits,
and Liberty Safes that come with free delivery and installation. They're located at 1
-255 Florida Avenue just north of Rocklands High School. For more information,
check them out at Freedom -Guns .com. Tell them you heard about him on the Shooting
Straight Radio podcast.
The gun site in Merritt Island is your one -stop shop for all of your Second
Amendment needs. Stop out there and see my friend, Steve Kennedy, and check out his
nine -lane 25 -yard indoor shooting range. He's got handgun rentals galore out there.
If you want to try it before you buy it, the gun site in Merritt Island is where
you need to go. Also, we've got a great selection of ammunition, accessories, range
bags, you name it, you'll find it out there at 125 South Banana River Drive in
Merritt Island. Check him out at gunsiterange .com. Make sure you tell Steve Kennedy
that Royce Bartlett sent you.
Roy's Bartlett, the keeper in the bearer of truth we know.
Only the facts about the Second Amendment. And never, ever forget that all gun
control laws are nothing less than overt acts of aggression against the American
people and their rights. Exercise your rights in a safe way. Stupidity to think that
Someone hell -bent on violating the law against murder will magically be stopped by a
gun control law. Politicians that infringe on our God -given rights,
he calls him out, he's not here to play.
So turn it on, tune in, crank it up.
Roy's Bartlett And the shooting straight show.
Let's go! Let's go!
Welcome to the program. Yes, we are indeed, locked, loaded, and loud. This is the
Shooting Straight Radio podcast, all about firearms with a heavy, heavy emphasis on
the Second Amendment, and all things pertaining there too. I am Royce,
you're also gracious, hugable, lovable, pleasable host, still saturated with gunshot
residue, toxic masculinity, and a faint yet oh so wildly tantalizing whiff of the
cologne of my people. Hops number nine, you know it, and we got a lot to cover
today. We're going to dive right into it in just a moment. First, I want to remind
you that you can catch the Shooting Straight Radio podcast on all major podcast
platforms. Also, you can follow us on social media. Look for the cool looking logo
since we rebranded it months back. And make sure you give us a like and a follow
and a share even on Facebook and on Instagram. You can reach out to me at Shooting
Straight Radio podcast at gmail .com or shoot
All guns and ammo are sales tax -free until the end of the year,
December 31st, 2025. So make sure you head down to the gun stores that support this
program in Brevard County, Florida. And make sure you tell them you heard about them
on the Shooting Straight Radio podcast. All right. Before we dive into a proposed
assault weapons ban in Florida. Yeah. These communists just don't like to stop.
And these Democrats, Democrat communists and the Muslims now are all supporting
civilian disarmament and trying to do so at every turn. And we know why.
The only reason anybody would ever want to disarm you is because they plan on doing
things to you that they know they should be shot for. And that's especially true
when we're dealing with Democrat communists. And they have a very unhealthy obsession
with assault weapons bans. And matter of fact, in St.
Paul, Minnesota, where they also have a heavy Muslim population there in that state,
they're trying to totally violate preemption there and pass a ban there. We'll talk
more about that in just a little bit. and we'll also talk about
And that is the Fraternal Order of Police and the International Association of Chiefs
of Police, which, as I understand it, are really nothing more than police unions,
but they have some clout. And they're all in, they've got their knickers in a knot,
all upset over potential national concealed carry reciprocity.
And I think the main reason they're upset about that is because they know it robs
them of power and they don't like that they also claim that it robs them of
qualified immunity and no it doesn't but it wouldn't bother me one bit if y 'all
had your qualified immunity just stripped from you all anyway too many of you are
not what should i say mature enough to work within the parameters of qualified
immunity and you have used it to do very unholy and ungodly things to citizens here
in this country. Now, before you go accusing me of soaking my head in YouTube, I
want you to first refute some of the things that are shown on YouTube of some of
you guys out there violating the living crap out of some citizens and their rights.
Some of you have been abusing qualified immunity, and it has cost lives also,
and just for reference sake, I'll say Philando Castile, who was shot unnecessarily by
a police officer when Philando was simply reaching for his concealed carry permit,
notified the police officer that he was reaching for it, and the police officer shot
him right in front of his friend. Yeah, and got off.
Basically, well, I was in fear for my life. Well, I tell you what, you could have
taken evasive actions. I've seen the video. You could have moved to the rear of the
vehicle very quickly, but instead you yanked your 40 -Cal out of your holster and
you shot Mr. Castile. And then you claim qualified immunity.
Now, these FOP, Fraternal Order of Police, are very upset,
and they have penned a letter to Congress saying, we stand against this.
We're just going to have all kinds of problems. It's going to create problems for
the police. You'll notice also in here, they only reference one time public safety.
The rest of the time, there are complaints against this bill that is demanding
concealed carry reciprocity nationwide. And by the way, we already freaking have that
in the form of the Second Amendment. But since too many people don't care about the
Constitution, and unfortunately that also encompasses many cops, then this is,
unfortunately, a necessity in this day and age to put you guys on notice that no
you can't do this crap some of the crap you're doing to people there are people
that have been arrested for simply crossing state lines with a firearm in their
vehicle not even on their person in their vehicle might i reference uh brian aitken
if you want to read his book about his uh woes inflicted upon him by the state of
New Jersey, get his book under the blue tent sky, and you can read it there.
Also, Miss Shanine Allen, who had a carry permit in Pennsylvania, but had the
audacity to cross state lines and assume that her carry permit was good there too.
And what happened to her? Same bloody thing. What this law would do if it was in
place would stop police officers from arresting innocent people who are carrying
firearms for their own protection. But to hear the FOP and the IACP tell it why
this is just going to end law enforcement as we know it. Here is their letter to
Congress generously interspersed with yours truly's Terry.
Leadership from the House, I'm sorry, leadership from the U .S. House of
Representatives recently announced that consideration of H .R. 38, the Concealed Carry
Reciprocity Act will be a priority when Congress returns. The National Fraternal Order
of Police, FOP, and the International Association of Chiefs of Police, IACP,
which collectively represent a majority of rank -and -file officers and police
executives. Okay, so what? Yeah, y 'all don't represent ordinary citizens in their
rights, do you? Have serious reservations about the impact this legislation would
have, listen, not on public safety, on officer safety,
officer liability, qualified immunity, and state and local gun safety laws.
When you use terminology like gun safety laws, you've already told me what side of
the fence you are on. That's right. You stand with the serial violators of the
Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Yeah. By the way, morons, the free responsible
exercise of our rights is not in the least bit contingent upon any of those
concerns you mentioned, fortunately for us. Are you then alleging that your officer
safety and your officer liability and your officer qualified immunity are more
important than the free exercise of our rights? And to be safe from being molested?
I don't mean that in a sexual term. I'm talking about in a legal term,
legally molested and have the law applied to them stringently when they've really
broken no law and they were simply exercising their rights. How come that isn't
important to you? No, you're only concerned with police officers. Yeah,
not the people who pay the police officers,
the legislation exempts any person with a valid photographic identification from state
or local firearms law, good, it should, who asserts they are lawfully carrying a
firearm under the laws of their own state of residence. Okay, so what?
Why is this an issue to you?
Any assumed problems that you predict are not sufficient reason or cause to continue
to violate the rights of people in various states simply because they cross state
line with a gun. You guys are totally making wild assumptions about this bill.
They say this is problematic, but the most concerning provision of H .R. 38 is that
it prohibits law enforcement officers from making any arrest or detaining a suspect
for any violation of state or local law pertaining to the possession, transportation,
or carriage of a firearm. Oh, no, no. You won't be able to just whimsically arrest
someone simply because they're carrying a firearm. That's terrible.
Please feel free to explain why and how this is going to actually impact public
safety. Oh yeah, that's not a concern in this letter at all. Yeah. You're more
concerned about the impact on cops. You should not have any authority to arrest or
detain anyone for any violation of any state law if they are freely exercising a
constitutionally protected right. You can't seem to grasp that,
can you? This also includes several federal laws,
such as carriage and school zones and federally managed lands. No, it does not. It
absolutely does not. I've read the deadgum thing, and you're a liar. Whoever wrote
this and whoever signed it. The bill goes further and provides that any person,
quote, who is deprived of any right privilege or immunity, end quote,
may sue a law enforcement officer who would not be afforded qualified immunity.
Well, good, because you're not allowed to deprive anybody of any right or privilege
or immunity that the Constitution protects. Why is your immunity to be vaunted above
ours, huh? Yeah,
qualified immunity has been very instrumental, in my not -so -humble opinion, and
transforming many people within today's police profession into thugs that have
literally gotten away with murder. I again referenced Philando Castile, not to mention
how many innocent Americans have been imprisoned for simply crossing a state's
boundary with a firearm, I repeat myself again. This makes it impossible for an
officer to conduct any investigation. No, it does not. It does not impede any
investigatory issues on your part at all.
With respect to ascertaining if the person is in fact compliant with the firearms
law in their state of residence. No, you won't have to figure that out in the
least. All you have to do is check and see if they've got any priors. And if
they're cleaned, leave them alone. Let them be. Let them continue on their way and
leave them alone. Unless, of course, you're trying to make an example out of them,
like some of you have. It would also expose the officer to civil liability if,
for example, they were to secure the firearm while they conducted an investigation
into other suspected criminal activity. That's a lie. No, it would not. They have
every right to do that, secure the firearm for officer safety. They have every right
to do that now. This would not be impacted in the bloody least. This is another
lie.
Officers would be expected to interpret and apply laws from all 50 states in real
time. That's not true. Without reliable means to verify an individual's eligibility to
carry concealed weapons. Not true. If they have no criminal record, they're eligible.
Leave them alone. Especially those from permitless carry states where no physical
permit exists. Oh my goodness. We might actually have people carrying constitutionally
into our state, and if our state says they can't do that, we're violated. That's
what they're saying here. This leaves law enforcement unable to confirm lawful
possession during encounters. No, it does not. Creating confusion and heightened risk
in high -stakes situations. No, it does not. Then they talk about impact on officer
safety. Once again, notice they don't say a deadgum thing about public safety.
Officer safety and legal liability. Why do you guys have a problem with being held
legally liable?
If the rest of us have to be, you have to be too. Law enforcement officers are
most likely to encounter armed citizens when responding to a disturbance call or
making a traffic stop. In 2024, 92 officers were shot when answering a disturbance
call. Okay, were they shot by lawful keepers and bearers? No, but you're talking
about impacting those same lawful keepers and bearers. Eight of whom were killed. In
that same year, 49 law enforcement officers were shot during traffic stops. Were they
shot by lawful keepers and bearers? Twelve of whom were killed. These two types of
calls represent 44 % of all officers shot in the line of duty in 2024.
One more time. How many were shot by lawful, responsible keepers and bearers?
Officers handle these encounters differently if their suspect is armed or discovered
to be armed. This is for their safety, the suspect's safety,
and public safety. No, this is for officer safety only. This has nothing to do with
suspect safety or public safety. You're welcome.
They give a hypothetical here. If a driver from Vermont, a state that allows its
residents to carry firearms without a license or permit, as they should, is stopped
by a Virginia state trooper as soon as the driver provides a valid photographic
identification and asserts that he or she is lawfully carrying under the laws of
Vermont, he or she has met the requirements of H .R. 38. Okay,
I'm scratching my head here trying to figure out what's wrong with that. What's so
terrible about that? What is so terrible about a citizen exercising their right
freely and responsibly? You are simply, you are literally in that paragraph alone
saying, we don't like that. That's what you're saying.
The driver is not subject to any of Virginia's firearms laws. Neither should they
be. And because the bill includes provisions that allow individuals to sue officers
and agencies for, I'm going to add here, unlawful detentions or arrests related to
concealed carry, and by the way, cops are already subject to that. The trooper would
be placing himself in legal jeopardy in taking any action that could be later
construed as depriving the driver of any rights or privileges. Morons?
This is already true. You cannot willy -nilly violate our rights and expect to be
held unaccountable. You can't do it. You will lose your qualified immunity already if
you violate our rights. You understand that? Yes, even with your qualified immunity,
that doesn't cover willful violations of people's rights. What you're afraid of is
that some of your cops that have been heavy -handed with law -abiding citizens are
going to get sent to prison. And you know what? I don't care. If you are heavy
-handed with citizens and not criminals, you don't belong on the force in the first
place. And if you have been abusing citizens, yes, you do belong in prison.
For that matter, you belong to be imprisoned at hard labor. This would include
securing the firearm to determine if the driver is impaired or engage in any other
criminal activity unrelated to the firearm. Another lie. If you secure the firearm,
it's only temporary. If you seize it unlawfully, yes, then you're liable.
If you arrest them for it, you're liable. The inability to confirm whether someone
is lawfully carrying a concealed firearm increases the risk of armed encounters and
reduces situational awareness for officers in the field. How? How does it reduce your
situational awareness? Situational awareness is a personal thing that a person
practices. How is this law going to affect your perception of situational awareness?
You see this crap.
No officer should be placed at greater risk, they mean liability risk, just because
they cannot use common practices. Well, I tell you what, if your common practices
have been violating people's rights, those common practices need to go, especially
when it comes to firearms carrying, which officers in every jurisdiction are trained
to do when encountering an armed suspect. Number one, why would you treat an armed
citizen who tells you they've got a firearm on their person right up front and
tells you they've got a carry permit from their state? How would you then refer to
them as a suspect? They're not a suspect unless you can articulate a crime that you
suppose they've committed.
They say it also jeopardizes qualified immunity. Good. Qualified immunity needs to be
stricken. I'm sorry. I used to be for it. Not anymore. No way. Forget it. Oh,
liability insurance for cops is going to cost so much more. I don't care. How come
we the people have to suffer because you don't want to pay more for liability
insurance? The bill also seems,
of every state in the union have a constitutional right to keep in bear arms.
That's what this bill is about, jackasses. That right does not end at other states'
lines.
Any action the officer may take in reaction to the knowledge that a person they
have encountered disarmed could place that officer in very real legal peril.
Oh, my goodness, so much to unpack in that statement right there. I'm not even sure
I want to dive into it.
You should already have the knowledge of these people's rights.
You should already be trained in constitutional case law. Sadly, the overwhelming
majority of police officers are not.
Why is it that it's terrible for officers to be placed in legal peril, but it's
okay for citizens to continue to be placed in that same legal peril? I'm going to
do a case, what should I say, a study on how many Americans are sitting in prison
due to firearms charges over silly crap, just like happened to Brian Aitken and
Chenine Allen. As described above, officers who fear their actions may result in
personal liability.
here's the other fear it undermines state sovereignty and authority to investigate no
it does not and any state that has passed any gun control law is already in
violation of the supreme law and that entire state and everybody that proposed that
law and everybody that voted yes on it and the governors who signed those laws they
should be sitting in the prison cells, not some wayfaring traveler who happened to
cross a state line into a place like New Jersey or New York. Many states already
recognize concealed carry permits from jurisdictions with comparable requirements such
as live training and enhanced background checks. I guess they meant live fire.
These agreements respect state sovereignty and public safety without overreach.
First of all, no state can claim sovereignty when it comes to violating the
citizens' rights. You don't get to do that. Well, we have a right to pass whatever
laws we want. No, you bloody well don't. The 14th Amendment is still there, and no
state may enact or enforce any law that contravenes or hinders or violates the
rights of any of the rights found in the Constitution in the Bill of Rights this
legislation would override these tailored arrangements so what and strip states of
their ability to set up and enforce their own standards for concealed carry good
because you don't have any right to set up, no state has the right to set up any
kind of standards for concealed carry. No state has the right to pass any gun
control laws in the first bloody place. Instead of officers being thoroughly trained
on their state and local gun safety laws, officers would be expected to interpret
and apply laws from all 50 states in real time, bull fertilizer. That is not true.
They go on with their conclusion about why they can't support this, and this is
nothing but fearmongering at its finest by a bunch of entitled people who think
they're above the citizenry and above the laws that us common folk have to obey.
Right. You know, you can still detain people that you find carrying officers.
You just can't arrest them for doing so. That's the gist of this. There's no reason
that any citizens should find themselves in legal jeopardy, simply because of a bunch
of ignorant cops who don't know or understand the Constitution. They don't know or
understand the Bill of Rights. They don't know the first deadgum thing about the
Second Amendment and the free exercise thereof. And so why is it that we have to
continue to put ourselves in legal jeopardy, but the rest of you police officers
don't have to do that. You talk about sovereign citizens. You guys are the sovereign
citizens, some of you. Yes, you think the laws don't apply to you. You think you're
above the laws and you can do whatever you damn well please without any
repercussions at all. Well, you can't. And this law, if it,
If it passes, it's going to put you guys back in your constitutional place, like it
or not. We'll take a brief commercial time out and be right back, and we're going
to talk about a proposed assault weapon ban here in the state of Florida.
Don't go anywhere. The listener retention squads are all on standby.
This is your humble host, And I am proud and honored to say that Sicario's Gun
Shop is a sponsor of the Shooting Straight Radio podcast. They're up on North
Wickham Road and Melbourne. They are your full service gun store. They offer a wide
range of firearms, including Class 3 and NFA weapons, ammo and accessories, gun
smithing. If you want to buy or trade, head on down to Sicario's Gun Shop. They
also offer transfer service, custom builds. If you need a muzzle device pinned and
welded, no problem they can do that too. Cotings, refinishings, cleanings, survival
safety items. Sicario's Gun Shop is your full -service gun store in North Melbourne.
They also have a fine selection of gun safes to choose from. Check them out at
Sicario's Gun Shop .com. Make sure you tell them you heard about them on shooting
straight. Sicario's Gun Shop, where you come first for your second.
Norm's Music Shop, producer and music creator for shooting straight radio podcast.
I can write and record a personalized music track for your audio or video projects.
Do you want a song for a special occasion? I can do that. For more information
contact, Norms Music Shop at gmail .com.
Let's create your musical identity. Thank you. Welcome back to the program.
I told you in the first portion at the break that we would be talking about a
proposed assault weapons band here in the state of Florida, your host home state.
And that's what we're going to do right now. First of all, I'm going to preface
everything by saying no state has any rights.
without any pushback. And when I say pushback, I'm talking about the kind of
pushback where you point your finger to them and you say, if you try to enforce
this, there's going to be one heck of a fight because that's where we're at. And
I'm redrafting the resolution of noncompliance for Florida. And Mr.
Smith, who wrote this monstrosity, is going to get a copy of it, along with all
the other state legislators. and matter of fact, I'm going to send a copy to as
many police departments as I can and let them know too. Don't even think about
enforcing this if you do, okay, if it passes. I mean, so, excuse me,
this is the usual Democrat communist assault weapons ban,
and it's going to be requiring certificates of possession for so -called assault
weapons, or large -capacity magazines, lawfully possessed before the specified date,
that is, and specifying requirements for the certificates to own the certificate so
you can own the gun, and then requiring a Department of Law Enforcement, that is
FDLE, to adopt rules by a specified date. Okay, Mr.
Smith, grab yourself a hammer and head for the sandpile, you scumbag. You have no
right to even propose this, and you, sir, should be dragged out of your office in
handcuffs, slammed over the hood of a waiting cop car, tossed into the back seat,
taken downtown, mugshotted, fingerprinted, given a, I'm going to be nice here,
given a nice cavity search, and let you sit in a cell for a few days to think
about your attitude, you scumbag. So, by the way, the requirements to the Department
of Law Enforcement will also be maintaining a file of all these certificates that
they also graciously approve or don't. Mm -hmm. Yeah, does this sound more and more
like New Jersey and beyond? Yeah. All right, so I'm not going to read all the
definitions and the exhaustive list of all the different models that this jackass is
trying to ban but um i'm not even going to go into all the various parts that
they say convert a regular rifle into an assault weapon threaded barrels and four
grips pistol grips and all this other crap what we're going to talk about is the
sale or transfer of of these also dreaded assault weapons.
All right. On line number 206, oh, actually 205, sale or transfer,
a person who within this state distributes, transports, or imports into this state,
who sells keeps for sale or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives an assault
weapon or a large capacity magazine in violation of this section except as provided
in paragraph c commits a felony of the third degree punishable as provided in
statute 775 .082, 775 .083 and 0 .084,
with a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment of two years.
That means if you don't follow this jackass's dictations in this law, you will be
instantly criminalized. B,
a person who transfers, sells, or gives an assault weapon, or a large capacity
magazine to a person under 18 years of age in violation of this section commits a
felony of the second degree. By the way, that's already part of Florida law and it
says with a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment of six years, a C,
paragraph A does not apply to the sale of assault weapons or large capacity
magazines to the Department of Law Enforcement a law enforcement agency as defined in
Statutes 934 .02, the Department of Corrections, or the military or naval forces of
this state, or of the United States for use in the discharge of their official
duties. Translation, there's a carve -out for all of you that are going to help
enforce this. Yeah, we'll treat you good while you treat all the citizens like crap,
and you'll get qualified immunity, basically. This is built -in qualified immunity.
This is saying you will not be arrested in charge for owning these weapons, but you
may go arrest and charge anybody else that's not a cop for owning these weapons.
How do you like that? All right, a person who is the executor or administrator of
an estate that includes an assault weapon or a large capacity magazine for which a
certificate of possession has been issued under subsection 4, in other words, they're
excluded too, and which is disposed of as authorized by the probate court if the
disposition is otherwise permitted under this section. Now, under possession, except as
provided in subsection 5, a person who within this state possesses any assault weapon
or large capacity magazine. I don't know about y 'all, but my magazine is pretty
much standard capacity. Except as provided in this section or as otherwise authorized
by law, commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided by statute 775
.082, 083, and 084, with a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment of one year.
Paragraph A does not apply to the possession of assault weapons or large capacity
magazines by members or employees of, here's the carve out again, the Department of
Law Enforcement, a law enforcement agency, the Department of Corrections, or the
military or naval forces of the state. And this section does not prohibit the
possession or use of assault weapons or large capacity magazines by swarmed members
of such agencies when on duty and when the use is within the scope of their
duties, like their scope of their duties as in arresting ordinary citizens who have
run afoul of this idiocy. C, paragraph A does not apply to the possession of an
assault weapon or a large capacity magazine by a person before July 1st, 2027,
if All of the following are applicable. We're going to grandfather him in.
You don't have to turn them in. No, but you've got to register them. And you have
to register them by getting that certificate. Here it is. The person is eligible to
apply for a certificate of possession under the subsection 4 for the assault weapon
or large capacity magazine by July 1, 2027. Or if the person lawfully possessed the
assault weapon or large capacity magazine before October 1st, 2026, or the person is
otherwise in compliance with this section and the applicable requirements of this
chapter for possession of the firearm. Well,
let's look at these certificates of possession now, shall uh by the way this is
registration this is built -in registration that's all this is a person who lawfully
let me qualify let me clarify this is a ban on all future sales and possessions
and if you are grandfathered in with a certificate of possession then you have
pretty much already registered your gun Okay. A person who lawfully possesses an
assault weapon or a large capacity magazine before October 1, 2026, must apply by
October 1, 2027, or if such person is a member of the military or naval forces in
the state or of the United States and is unable to apply by October 1, 2027,
because he or she was on official duty outside of the state, must apply within 90
days after returning to this state to the Department of Law Enforcement for a
certificate of possession with respect to such assault weapon or large capacity
magazine. Translation. The Florida Department of Law Enforcement, which I better not
run that rabbit trail. Let's put it this way. They don't have a lot of respect
from people around here they're going to be in charge of issuing or not issuing
your certificate of possession and it's going to be a may issue and not a shall
issue and even if it was a shall issue it's only a matter of time before they say
okay well y 'all need to turn those in after all that that's exactly what's going
to happen that's the communist playbook it says um they must that's it with respect
Oh, yes, the certificate must contain a description of the assault weapon, serial
number, or large capacity magazine, which identifies it uniquely,
including all identification marks, serial number, the full name, address, date of
birth, and thumbprint of the owner, and any other information as the department may
deem appropriate. Oh, What?
That means the FDLE is going to be given leeway to create their own criteria if
they deem it appropriate. In other words, this is open -ended, which means they can
add on at will. That's what they worked into the wording here. The thumbprint of
the applicant must be taken by a law enforcement agency or the Department of law
enforcement together with any personal identifying information required by federal law
to process fingerprints. So they're not just registering your assault weapon.
They're registering you. Certificate of possession of assault weapon must contain the
certificate number. The owner's name, last, first, middle. Address,
No PO boxes allowed. With street number, the city or town,
state and zip code, your date of birth, your social security number,
your driver's license number, and state, the manufacturer of your firearm,
the importer of your firearm, the serial number, the model, the caliber, unique ID
markings, signature of owner, applicants write thumbprint. That's what you're going to
have to have to own an AR -15 in the state of Florida if this filthy little
godless communist has his way. Now, an assault weapon or large capacity magazine
possessed pursuant to this subsection, I'm sorry, section, may not be sold or
transferred on or after January 1, 2027, to a person within this state other than
to a licensed dealer or provided in subsection 5 or by a bequest or intestate
succession, a person who obtains title to an assault weapon or a large capacity
magazine for which a certificate of possession has been issued under this subsection
by bequest test state succession, must, within 90 days after obtaining title,
apply to the Department of Law Enforcement for a certificate of possession as
provided in this subsection, or render the assault weapon or large capacity magazines
permanently inoperable, sell the weapon or large capacity magazine to a licensed
dealer, or remove the weapon or large capacity magazine from this state.
A person who moves into this state and is in lawful possession of an assault weapon
or large capacity magazine must within 90 days either render the weapon or large
capacity magazine permanently inoperable sell the weapon or large capacity magazine to
a licensed gun dealer, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. A person who has
issued a certificate of possession for an assault weapon or a large capacity magazine
under this subsection may possess it only under the following conditions. One,
at the person's residence, place of business, or other property owned by that person,
or on property owned by another person with the owner's express permission.
Two, While on the premises of a target range or public private club or organization
organized for the purpose of practicing shooting at targets. Three, while on a target
range that holds a regulatory or business license for the purpose of practicing
shooting at that target range. You know what they just did there? Did you catch
that? You can only shoot these at a range that's been approved by the state and is
regulated. Four, while on the premises of a licensed shooting club.
Five, while attending any exhibition, display, or educational program that is about
firearms and is sponsored by conducted under the auspices of or approved by a law
enforcement agency or a nationally or state -recognized entity that fosters proficiency
in or promotes education about firearms. Or six,
while transporting the assault weapon or large capacity magazine between any of the
places mentioned in this paragraph or to any licensed gun dealer for servicing or
repair pursuant to paragraph 7, provided the assault weapon or large capacity
magazine, is transported as required by subsection 7. In other words, we're going to
tell you how you can carry it. We're going to tell you how you can keep it in
your vehicle. Mm -hmm.
Okay. If an applicant for a certificate of possession under this subsection fails to
qualify for the certificate after the background investigation required under this
subsection, the applicant must arrange to relinquish all assault weapons or large
capacity magazines in his or her possession, as provided in subsection 6,
within 10 days after he or she receives written notice from the Department of Law
Enforcement of Failure to Qualify for the Certificate. Such applicant who fails to
make such an arrangement within this time specified in this paragraph is therefore in
violation of this section you know what if you want to sell it you also have to
get a certificate of transfer to to transport it you have to go through their
rigmarole here too you have to in other words the state this guy wants the state
to be in total control of your
total power grab. And again, I say, Mr. Smith, because I know you're going to be
getting a copy of this episode, you are a treasonous pile of crap.
You, sir, belong in prison. You are willfully assaulting the Constitution.
You took an oath to uphold and defend it. That makes you a violator thereof, and
you, sir, should be subjected to very harsh penalties, therefore. You should be
sentenced to hard labor for a minimum of 20 years. I don't think you would last
the first year. I saw a picture of you, and you, sir, are a very effeminate man.
And I can only make speculations as to why you don't want real men owning and
keeping and bearing these guns, but I'll just leave that right there. You, sir,
neither you nor any of your fellow legislators have any right, any constitutional
authority to craft a law like this, to enact a law like this,
or to have this law enforced while I'm at it. Law enforcement officers,
none of you have any constitutional authority to arrest anybody for lawfully keeping
and bearing arms. You have zero authority to enforce any gun control law.
of us to send very stern warnings, and again, I reference notice of noncompliance,
yeah, a resolution of noncompliance. These things need to be put before them
immediately. So I have already begun crafting them for various states.
As soon as I have your state ready, I'll announce it on the program, and you can
hit me up for a copy of it. I'll be glad to send it to you. I recommend you
send it to every law enforcement agency in your state, and you send it directly to
the legislature of your state, and you send it to the governor of your state, and
you let them know just how criminally liable they actually are for even thinking
about crafting gun control laws. I tell you what,
I'm at the point right now where if y 'all are ready to stand up and line up and
point your fingers at these people. I'm ready yesterday. I'm not going to do this
all by myself. I'm not going to be the crash test dummy for all of you. I need
your help too. So I implore all of us to straighten our spines,
jump up and down so our testicles drop, resituate our guts and stand up to these
people and say, y 'all are serial violators of our Supreme law, and you belong in
prison, and if you try to enforce any laws like this assault weapons ban,
we have every right to defend ourselves with whatever force we deemed to be
necessary. Does that sound radical to you? Well, if it does,
you're on the wrong side of the Constitution. Stay in contact with your reps stay
trained up, stay armed up. Make sure you got plenty of ammo. Make sure you got
plenty of dried goods and food. Make sure you got plenty of trauma supplies and
never forget. Incoming rounds always have the right of way. Royce out.
I believe