Stalling, Sikhs and Suppressors

FIRST HALF: Attorney General of Florida, James Uthmeier, is back in 2nd Amendment news by declaring Florida's 3-day and 5-day waiting (stalling?) periods unconstitutional.

SECOND HALF: Massachusetts school district allows Sikh students to carry their ceremonial knives, while continuing to ban all knives and all other weapons from the rest of the student body.

Ninth Circuit rules that suppressors are not protected by the 2nd Amendment.

Transcript

Freedom Guns is your local gun store for the Rockledge Cocoa area in Brevard County,
Florida. Stop in and meet Mike and the gang and see the great deals they have on long guns,
handguns, accessories, ammunition, AR build kits, and Liberty Safes that come with free delivery
and installation. They're located at 1255 Florida Avenue, just north of Rockledge High School.
For more information, check them out at freedom-guns.com. Tell them you heard about them on the
Shooting Straight Radio podcast.
The Gun Sight in Merritt Island is your one-stop shop for all of your Second Amendment needs.
Stop out there and see my friend Steve Kennedy and check out his nine-lane, 25-yard indoor
shooting range. He's got handgun rentals galore out there. If you want to try it before you buy it,
the Gun Sight in Merritt Island is where you need to go. Also, we've got a great selection of
ammunition, accessories, range bags. You name it, you'll find it out there at 125 South Banana
River. Drive in Merritt Island. Check him out at gunsightrange.com.
Make sure you tell Steve Kennedy that Royce Bartlett sent you.
Less than old aggression against the American people. Exercise your right.
That someone held against murder to be stopped by a gun control law.
You
heard the man. He said, let's go. So let's go. We are locked, loaded, and loud on the Shooting
Straight radio podcast. This is all about firearms. with the heavy, heavy emphasis on the Second
Amendment and all things pertaining thereto. I am Royce, your cute,
cuddly, huggable, lovable, squeezable host, still saturated with gunshot residue,
toxic masculinity, and a faint yet Oh, so wildly tantalizing whiff of the cologne of my people,
hops number nine. Absolutely. If you'd like some show decals,
hit me up at shootingstraightradiopodcast at gmail.com. By the way, for all of you that sent me
your address thus far, your decals went out today. Today is Tuesday,
the 9th of June. And so hopefully you'll have them within a week. If you don't receive them within
a couple of weeks, please reach back out to me and I'll reissue some for you. Also,
if you follow me on my website, shootingstraightradio.buzzsprout.com,
you can leave me a voice message there also and not just a typed message. The problem is I'm not
able to respond to you on that medium. So if you want an immediate answer,
shootingstrikeradiopodcast at gmail.com. All right, let's dive right on into things.
First of all, let's talk about some gear and some guns in the very prominent in the Second
Amendment world right now. Many of you own a Glock 43X, and I'm one of those people,
or a Glock 48. It's the same frame. They both have different slides, but the slides are literally
interchangeable between the two. So what Glock has now done,
they have created their own. version of the 15 round magazine for the 43x and 48 and it's a metal
magazine you do not have to change out your mag release like you do with the shield arms mags i
don't recommend the shield arms mags of course because i'm a glock certified armorer and you should
never put non-glock parts into your glock reason being once you do glock no longer recognizes that
as a glock pistol So if you have any issues with it, they simply will tell you,
we don't know whose pistol this is, but it's not ours. Maybe not in so many words,
but they're not going to honor any warranty on it, okay? Just so you know, these new magazines are
a game changer, and they have absolutely redefined and revitalized Glock's 43X and 48 line.
I'm telling you, it's a slimmer package. a lot easier to conceal, and you've got 15 rounds of self
-defense capability that is not insignificant, especially considering the small package that it's
in. My 43X is my go fishing gun, go to the mailbox gun,
mow the yard gun, walk the dog gun, and I felt fairly protected with the 10-round magazines
because I always carry spares. But now, what I used to carry in three magazines,
I can do in two. And that, definitely, I like that equation a lot better.
Especially when you're out walking your dog. There is always the very real possibility of other
four-legged critters deciding to come and gang up on your dog. It wouldn't be the first time it
happened. And about the time you stick yourself into the mix to break them up, you're going to get
bit too. So, you may have to defend yourself against a four-legged critter and not just a two
-legged critter. And that's certainly where a Glock 43X comes into play. And it comes into play
handily. Hopefully, you also carry pepper spray and a blade. I never have just one weapon on me or
one means of defense. I think many of you have already heard me say, I carry pepper spray all the
time. It's always on my person. The reason being is... spray is a lot easier for me to explain in a
court of law than if I took my fist and gave somebody a good crack upside the head or broke their
jaw or whatever and caused them long-term injury or possibly even death.
You clip somebody's chin and spin it around to the back of their head and they fall backwards and
they pop their melon and they die, you have just committed what's known as a one-punch homicide.
Give them a little hot sauce to the face. Let them sit there and weep and wail and sling snot
everywhere while you casually stroll away. And hopefully they'll be thinking about their attitude.
Because again, pepper spray is so much easier to explain in a court of law than someone like me who
has, you know, very established fighting skills. um the there's always going to be kinds of all
kinds of questions well why did you have to hit them so hard or why did you hit them in that
particular spot. Didn't you know that you could kill it? And all those kinds of questions with
pepper spray nullifies all of that. Plus you don't have to break your hand on some idiot's head.
And that's always a big plus. Now let's gravitate to the P320, the six hour P320,
or should we maybe give it the moniker of the infamous P320 because it has been given a very bad
rap. And yes, largely I'm going to tell you it's undeserved. All of the cases that I have seen
where these guns allegedly just went off by themselves while in a policeman's holster or something
like that, that was an uncommanded discharge.
The problem with that is those have all been debunked. As a matter of fact,
I happen to know personally one of the investigators that happened to look into some of these
alleged uncommanded discharges of six-hour P320s. One of them was a state trooper who claimed all
I did was just lean over to the left while I was sitting in my squad car and the gun just went off.
Well, the problem with that is, I'm just going to call him Eric. That is his first name,
and you don't need to know his second name, and I don't have his permission to use his name on the
air. Eric found a spent casing. on the driver's side,
in the seat there. Plus, the trajectory of the pistol and the hole that was made in the floorboard
of the cruiser did not and could not even remotely line up with the man's story.
First of all, think about this. How many of you know what a Level 3 duty holster is?
Most of you probably do. It is utterly impossible For a gun that is secured in a level three
holster, it's impossible for that slide to actuate and toss out an empty casing.
But yet there was an empty casing laying on the seat beside the trooper or where he would have been
sitting. The second involved a municipal police officer. She claimed that all she did was just take
her duty belt off and went to sling it up on the bed and it just bumped the bedpost. and went off
and fired a round down through the floor down into the apartment below her thankfully nobody was
injured but she too was found to be let's just say less than honest because one more time there was
an empty casing that had been ejected from a a gun that was secured inside of a level three
retention holster and The trajectory did not even remotely line up with her story.
So while what exactly happened may not have been disclosed,
it was obviously two people playing with their dadgum guns and did something stupid with it.
And then going on... initial reports about the 320 because there were some issues if you dropped it
and it hit the heel it could have just it could have discharged they have fixed that they sent out
a recall and they did fix that issue and now what happens is every time somebody does something
stupid with their firearm they blame the gun oh it's a p320 of course and they're going on it's
undeserved reputation. Yes, I'm going to call it an undeserved reputation. Now, I was challenged on
this when some guy says, well, here's a video for you to look at. And it's a police officer
standing in the kitchen of somebody and he was trying to effect an arrest. Looked to me like he was
getting a little bit out of hand. But anyway, he had just allegedly holstered his pistol.
The problem is I zoomed in on the holster. And that pistol was sitting up out of the holster and
had not been completely inserted therein. I'm not sure what actuated the trigger,
but that thing was not holstered. But the story still got out that it went off in this cop's
holster and he didn't even have his hand on it. No, he didn't have his hand on it. But he also did
not have it holstered completely. Now, somebody else brought out the recent story of two airmen
where one shot the other with a P320, allegedly with the gun just laying there on the table,
and it just went off and struck this guy in the chest and killed him. Bull fertilizer. That's not
what happened. They found out later that it was an intentional shooting. So,
all of this crap that just, you know, likes to pile on,
so to speak, and blame the scapegoat. and blame the equipment rather than blame the person who
should not have had their finger on the blippity-blanking trigger. The reason I'm bringing this
out is, recently, there was a P320 case that was dismissed in federal court in Colorado,
and another one that was dismissed in Massachusetts federal court.
Basically... and vindicating Sig Sauer that their P320 line is not the dangerous hair-triggered
rat trap waiting to go off at a moment's notice if you look at it too hard. Now,
let me give you an anecdotal story. And this happened to me like two or three days ago when a man
came into the shop and he asked me, he said, do you guys take trade-ins? I said, no,
sir. We only take trade-ins from agencies that we have supplied. We don't take trade-ins from
individuals. He said, that's too bad. I want to get rid of this 320, man. It's dangerous. Okay.
Immediately, my ears perked up like I can't wait to hear this story. He claimed that he had just
left the range and it had fired uncommanded while he was at the range and even swore that his
finger was off the trigger. And the way he said it was, My finger was way up on the slide.
And immediately when he said that, let's just say I have this nasty gift of being able to pick up
on when someone's lying to me right to my face, especially when I'm watching his eyes divert back
and forth. When just a second ago, he was looking at me in the eye while he was talking. And then
suddenly he said, well, my finger was way up on the trigger, way up on the slide. I mean, and there
was no way that I did it. Thankfully, I had it pointed downrange. but all my friends saw it too.
Well, again, his story was very suspect because his eyes began to act weird as he was telling me
the story and other telltale body language signs. Well,
I hand him, I've got some training guns there. They're inert. They cannot fire. And I handed him,
I said, well, just show me how you were holding the gun when it went off. When he took possession
of that fake gun, I was sitting there thanking God that it was not a P320 because guess where his
finger went immediately? Yep, right to the trigger well and right on the trigger.
And I said, please take your finger off the trigger. Oh, yeah, well, it was a training gun. I
didn't think, I'm thinking, yeah, I think I know what really happened here. Worse than that,
when I told him we didn't take trades or buy used firearms, immediately I was going,
You want somebody else to have this? If it's so dangerous, why do you want somebody else to have
this gun? Why would you want them to have a machine that could possibly injure or kill them or a
family member now he solidified my suspicions when he said well maybe i'll just give it to one of
my kids yeah you caught that that's when i knew without question he was lying about the incident
why in the world would you give such a weapon that you claim is so dadgum dangerous why would you
give that to your own children yeah
because he was full of bull fertilizer and he knew he was lying. Yeah, and I think my eyes looking
at him when he finally looked up let him know that I thought he was full of crap. I think what
happened was he embarrassed himself on the range by having a negligent discharge and wanted to make
a show of rectifying the situation by blaming the gun. Well... It just don't work like that.
So that's my role on the P320s. Do I like P320s?
No, I like them better back... The P320 is basically the old P250 frame,
and I used to carry a P250 45 ACP, and I loved it. But I like Glocks,
and that's pretty much all I carry now. And I have no use for... any other striker fired weapon
because glocks for me point naturally and they totally agree with my shooting style and I point
shoot center mass literally out to 50 feet without even needing my sights. Now I'm not patting
myself on the back and telling you what a wonderful shooter I am. I'm simply saying they work for
me and they work better for me than any other firearm. I know that's going to hurt the feelings of
some of you 1911 purists because I love 1911s too. And I used to blaspheme Glocks.
I used to call them combat Tupperware because I carried a 1911. Whoa, whoa, whoa.
Because pistol whipping somebody with plastic just doesn't get your point across, as I used to say.
But, well, let's just say I've had a change of mind and a change of heart.
And pretty much all I do is carry Glocks now because the loudest sound in a gunfight is click.
That's right. Okay, a story out of Florida, down here in my home state.
Our Attorney General down here, while he has had his faults and not everything he has done do I
agree with, he has also made great strides in restoring Second Amendment rights here and even doing
it without running it through the courts for, I mean, without running it through the legislature
for repeal. He did it. using the courts now he what he did basically he came out and said waiting
periods are unconstitutional and they will not be enforced and we have a three-day waiting period
here in florida and in some areas of the state like alachua county and volusia county they also
have extended that out to five-day waits my problem with that is waiting periods are infringements
in every way shape and form they lawfully I mean, I'm sorry, they unlawfully and immediately
infringed the right of peaceable citizens to keep and bear arms for a minimum of three days.
Well, Royce, come on, man. It's just a three-day wait. I mean, if you can't wait three days to
take possession of a gun, then maybe you shouldn't have one. And I've heard crap like that until I
want to vomit. But let me ask you this question, because I am a stickler for constitutional
propriety. Does the Constitution permit the government in any way,
shape, or form to infringe the right of the people to keep, that is, purchase or build,
and bear or carry arms? Well, obviously, especially for most of my audience,
I'm pretty sure all of you guys already know the answer. No, the Constitution does not permit the
government to infringe our rights in any way, shape, or form. Not even for a few minutes.
Not even for an hour. Definitely not for three to five days.
That is certainly out of the question. Especially when someone has just gone through a federal
background check in order to take possession of that gun, and then they're still told, yes,
you're eligible to own this, but you're going to wait three more days. Why?
Oh, cooling off period. Oh, but you can only, your cooling period, your cooling off period,
it can only be done on weekdays and workdays, not on weekends or holidays.
Yes, you can only cool off on the more stressful days of the week and not the happier days like the
weekends and holidays. Yes, that's impossible. So in the infinite wisdom of the state, you may only
cool off for three work days. Or five work days if you live in Alachua County or Volusia County.
Well, Florida Attorney General James Uthmeyer, and this is an article by Cam Edwards that I'm going
to be heavily referencing, where the title is, Florida Attorney General says states' waiting period
laws are unconstitutional and will not be enforced. And here's the article.
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeyer. appears to have accomplished what state lawmakers were
unable, and in some cases unwilling, to do for the past several years.
Get rid of the state's three-day waiting period on gun sales. that was signed into law by then
-Governor Rick Scott after the Parkland shooting in 2018. I think it happened,
actually, that original three-day wait happened back in 1990, but don't quote me on that.
I'm trying to, you know, going on my memory, which is not the greatest anymore. But I must say
right now, regarding the passing of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas Act, I have never seen so many
weak-minded, cowardly, Gutless. Republicans,
so-called. As I did in the emotional aftermath of that slaughter at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High
School, which took place as a sheriff's deputy stood outside.
They got him on camera. He was henceforth monikered and nicknamed the Coward of Broward.
He stood outside listening to the shooting happen.
and did nothing to go in and protect the children and teachers inside. Yeah,
he was more like the one-man precursor to the cowardice shown at Uvalde.
Do you know that that bill was passed overwhelmingly by Republicans, so-called?
Yes. And in the House, Democrats only voted,
only 16 Democrats voted for it. The Republicans vote, 33 of them voted for it.
Just let that sink in. Yes, the Republicans shoved this gun control package down the throats of
Floridians. I'm sorry, that was the Senate. In the House, the Democrat Party only voted,
only 41 Democrats voted for the Marjory Stoneman Douglas Act. 76 Republicans voted for it.
What does that tell you? And now the peaceable citizens of Florida, They're somehow required to pay
for the shooter's crimes and the deputy's cowardice by sacrificing more of their rights.
And none of the items passed in the Marjory Stoneman Douglas Act of 2018 would have done a dadgum
thing to stop. Yes, none of the proposals offered and crammed into law would have done a darn thing
to stop that demon-infested little punk from doing what he did. Yeah,
that's flabbergasting to me that that was rammed through by people who claim to be the party of the
Constitution and the defenders of the Constitution and all that's right with America.
They crammed through.
this monstrosity by using an emotional wave to wash it through and wash it down the throats of the
citizenry. Back to the article. Uthmeyer's official announcement comes a day after Brian Kramer,
who serves as the chief prosecutor for Alachua, Baker, Bradford, Gilchrist, Levi, and Union
Counties, told Alachua County officials that based on a judgment agreed to by both parties in a
case called Dunn v. Glass, quote, the Attorney General and other defendants have agreed to the
entry of a judgment declaring unconstitutional Florida's statutory and constitutional waiting
period. No, what do you mean constitutional waiting period? There is no such thing.
That's kind of like jumbo shrimp. Yeah. Or she's pretty ugly. Yeah.
You know what I'm saying? That's a contradiction in terms. There's no such thing as a
constitutional waiting period. So declaring unconstitutional Florida's statutory wait.
I'm not even going to call them. I'm not going to read that part of the sentence. Statutory waiting
period provisions to the extent they require a firearm to be held beyond the time necessary to
complete a background check. The proposed judgment is based upon the conclusion that such waiting
periods burden the right to keep and bear arms and cannot be justified under the historical
tradition analysis required by the United States Supreme Court's modern day Second Amendment
jurisprudence. I am happy to see that the Bruin decision is still having some good impacts all
around the country. As a result, Kramer said his office will no longer prosecute violations of the
state's three-day waiting period nor the five-day waiting period put in place in Alachua County a
few years ago. By the way, let me bring something to your attention, all of you FFLs out there,
and I work for one too. We, as a matter of fact, had a pretty in-depth discussion about this
yesterday.
a firearms law attorney. And he's been on the program before, but I don't have permission to use
his quote from him. But I spoke to him yesterday and his advice was for all FFLs to wait until FDLE
issues a declaration regarding this or some sort of a memo.
saying that it will not be enforced anymore and that three-day waiting periods are no longer
constitutional. And so keep that in mind as we go forward from here.
Just because there's a story about it and because James Uthmeyer has issued a declaration on it
doesn't mean that it's enforced and we can go ahead and just stop. uh you know enforcing waiting
periods as much as we hate them and as much as they are infringements and as much as we ffls
despise being used as de facto enforcers of gun control yeah anyway alachua county is one of six in
the state that took advantage of the language in the state's waiting period law, allowing them to
establish a separate five-day waiting period for gun transfers conducted on public property like
gun shows. Broward, Hillsborough, Miami-Dade, Palm Beach, and Volusia counties all have ordinances
that are substantially similar to Alachua counties. And based on Kramer's letter,
it appears those ordinances are or soon will be null and void as well.
This is not the first time that Uthmeyer has used the courts to restore the Second Amendment rights
of Floridians. Last year, Uthmeyer declined. to appeal a decision by a Florida appellate court that
ruled the state's ban on open carry was unconstitutional. Yes, well,
by the way, if you were following the story down here in Florida of an HOA that tried to ban its
residents from concealed carrying on the public sidewalks around the HOA,
He shut that down real quick and told them flat out, you're about to each face a fine of $5,000.
You could face up to a year in jail and you could be definitely and definitively fired from your
position and banned from it perpetually. Okay. So he shut that down too.
He has been pretty friendly towards the second amendment. Um,
the second amendment advocates with groups like Florida carry. had been lobbying lawmakers for
years to repeal the open carry ban, but were continually stymied by Republican leadership in the
state Senate. Yes, Ben Albatron. And who was the other caterwauling cow up there?
What was her name? Oh yeah, Miss Pasadomo. Sounds a lot like Quasimodo for me.
Anyway, the same is true of Florida's waiting period law. Years of lobbying for repeal.
buy-in from the Florida House, and roadblocks from the Florida Senate president. Thankfully,
Senator Ben Albatron has no say in what the Attorney General's office agrees to in court,
and lawmakers won't be able to stand in the way of the judgment taking effect. Uffmire has also
declined to defend Florida's ban on gun sales to adults. under the age of 21,
which has been the subject of litigation for several years now. The 11th Circuit upheld the
statute, but the case has been sitting with four others at the Supreme Court for months now.
and will likely be granted cert, vacated, and remanded to the lower courts after the Wolford and
Hemini decisions are released in a few weeks. Once that happens, we can see another settlement
similar to Dunn v. Glass, with Uthmeyer agreeing with the plaintiffs that the gun ban for young
adults violates the Second Amendment and cannot be enforced. Well,
good. I'm pretty hugely impressed with Mr. Uthmeyer on this. And I'm glad that he is where he is at
this particular time. Now, by the way, there's also the possibility that another attorney general
coming after him will try to undo everything that he's done, which would not surprise me.
But for the time being, we have somebody who is trying to defend our rights up there in Florida,
in Tallahassee. And I thank God for him. We're going to take a brief commercial timeout,
and then when we come back, we're going to show where, oh, we're going to talk one story where
Massachusetts Public School District is permitting, oh, let's just call them violent jihadist
immigrant kids to carry knives in school. Oh,
of course, while banning all the other students from doing that. Gee, what could possibly go wrong?
This is your humble host, and I am proud and honored to say that Sicario's Gun Shop is a sponsor of
the Shooting Straight Radio podcast. They're up on North Wickham Road in Melbourne. They are your
full-service gun store. They offer a wide range of firearms, including Class III and NFA weapons,
ammo and accessories, gunsmithing. If you want to buy or trade, head on down to Sicario's Gun Shop.
They also offer transfer service, custom builds. If you need a muzzle device pinned and welded, no
problem. They can do that, too. Coatings, refinishings, cleanings, survival safety items. Sicario's
Gun Shop is your full-service gun store. In North Melbourne, they also have a fine selection of
gun safes to choose from. Check them out at SicariosGunShop.com. Make sure you tell them you heard
about them on Shooting Straight. Sicario's Gun Shop, where you come first for your second.
Norm's Music Shop, producer and music creator for Shooting Straight Radio Podcast.
I can write and record a personalized music track for your audio or video projects. Do you want a
song for a special occasion? I can do that. For more information, contact Norm's music shop at
gmail.com.
Let's create your musical identity. Thank you. Welcome back to the program.
And thank you for hanging with me on the 796th episode of the shooting straight radio podcast,
four episodes away from 800. Yeah. I really appreciate all of you in the listening audience.
Thank you for your continued encouragement. And, man, we're going to keep riding this thing till
the wheels fall off of it, as far as I'm concerned. Until the good Lord takes me out of here or
shuts the show down by whatever means he deems necessary, I'm going to continue here on this mic.
And we will be talking about our God-given precious right to keep and bear arms.
So, speaking of arms, excuse me.
I'm going to probably offend a lot of people with this comment, but it's only going to be people,
the only people offended will be people who have a suicidal empathy,
I believe is the term being bandied about now. And it is a suicidal empathy, much like we see going
on in Europe, in the UK, where everything seems to center around not offending people who think
it's totally fine with their God to rape, rob,
murder, behead, you know, men, women, and children.
Yeah, no age distinction at all. These sick, twisted people think it's okay for old men to marry
nine-year-old girls and impregnate them and to, well,
I'm not... I'm not going to try to elaborate too heavily on everything, but suffice it to say,
these are sick, twisted, as far as I'm concerned, demon-possessed people.
And all of them think that they, like Jesus once said, that one day men will think they're doing
God a favor by killing you. Now, I paraphrased that. Well, that's these people. These people think
their god says it's okay to lie, steal, cheat, rape, rob, murder,
and that the more they do against so-called infidels, the more highly favored they will be by
their false god. Now, such a suicidal empathy is very prevalent in this country today and in all of
the Democrat-Communist areas. all the ones deeply controlled by Democrats,
so-called. They are letting these people in and they are giving them preferential treatment even
above the citizenry, even in the protection area. And these Democrat idiots are going so far and to
such an extent to not offend these people's religion.
that tells them it's okay to rape, rob, kill, murder, you know, everything like that. Yeah, they
don't want to offend them because they don't want to be called racist. First of all,
a religion is not a race. Especially if it's a... an ideology masquerading as a religion,
which is exactly what Islam is. And I know I'm going to make some more Islamo-fascist enemies
here, and I just absolutely do not care. Anytime you boys want to bring a fight to me, it does not
matter. You bring it, don't sing it, baby. Come get you a bite of this here, Georgia Bulldog. Be
glad to oblige you. Well, I don't really look for confrontation, but I guarantee you,
if you bring the fight to me, I'm going to pour it back all over you. And you better bring more
than one person, too. Anyway,
these people get preferential treatment over and above Americans.
And now in Massachusetts, which is, as we know, a Democrat-communist-controlled area of the
United States that also is afflicted with the suicidal empathy, this Massachusetts public school
district permits students who are Sikhs, S-I-K-H,
to carry knives. Yeah, to carry their ceremonial knives.
But at the same time, they're banning weapons from all the other students. Make this make sense.
It doesn't make sense unless you are suicidally empathetic, which is exactly the case here.
And here's an article by Cassandra McDonald from June 5th. It says,
Hopkins Public Schools. in Massachusetts has a policy that carves out a specific religious
exception to its strict, apparently not too strict, no weapons rule,
allowing initiated Sikh students to carry a ceremonial knife known as a kirpan on school grounds
while prohibiting knives, guns, even replicas or other weapons from every other student.
The policy, formally created in 2024, makes Hopkinton the first school district in the state to
explicitly accommodate the Kirpan for Sikh students. Now, how many of you guys are familiar with
the Henry Nowak case in the UK? He was stabbed by a little Sikh creep with a Kirpan.
Yes, and then because the murderer... told the responding officers that,
well, he insulted me and he was being racist. They handcuffed the bleeding young man on the ground.
That's how mentally destroyed these people are.
They are morally dyslexic to the nth degree. All of you cops in England.
If you are not actively resisting these scums and you are helping them prey upon your fellow
citizens there, you are trash. You are traitors to your people. You are traitors to your country.
And you do not deserve to be breathing free air. Every dadgum one of you that has done something
like this, especially those of you that helped cover up for the rape gangs, you all deserve to be
hanged by your neck until you are dead. Yeah, I'm not feeling real generous right now when I read
some of this crap going on, and I know that it's already starting to come here, and it already has
happened here. There have been Islamic honor killings here in the United States.
So, yes, this crap is coming. Matter of fact, we have a big stronghold of these. scumbags in the
Tampa area of my state. And they want to enact Sharia law and do Sharia patrols there in Tampa.
And Tampa is nothing but a Democrat communist stronghold. So that Sikh man in the UK,
23-year-old, stabbed his victim five times with that ceremonial dagger,
which has an eight-inch blade on it. And again, the police cuffed the victim.
and then mocked him, essentially, as he laid there bleeding out. He died right there at their feet.
Back to the article. Under the district's general weapons policy, possession of any dangerous
weapon is banned on school premises, at school-sponsored events, or on school transport.
This includes guns, knives, pocket knives, slingshots, brass knuckles, explosives,
ammunition, and even replicas or toys that resemble weapons. Oh, all you have to do then is say,
hey, I'm a Sikh. Well, if all it takes is that declaration, then the rest of you boys start arming
yourselves against these scumbags. Here is something that I guarantee you is going to play out.
There is really... no other alternative. There's really no other outcome.
When you let these people who have no problem stabbing infidels with their curb hands and you let
them walk around school grounds amongst unarmed people that they consider to be infidels,
what in the blippity blank and blip do you think is going to happen? We all know what's going to
happen. We're soon going to hear about a mass stabbing event where multiple stabbers are going to
create multiple stabbies. And there are going to be a lot of school kids cut down, stabbed,
probably even beheaded in the school common area, and God knows what else. What could possibly go
wrong? This is where this suicidal empathy brings us, and it seems to only inflict you filthy
Democrats. Yeah.
Violations of the weapons policy can lead to suspension, expulsion, police referral,
and possible expulsion by the school committee. Unless you're a Sikh immigrant,
illegal or whatever, and you say, well, this is my religious ceremonial knife.
Hmm. Well, I'll tell you what. I think there needs to be a new religion started in...
that county there in uh what was it called um what's what's the county oh hopkington all of you
american boys there start a new religion yeah and matter of fact because your new religion is going
to demand your adherence to a policy that says you must carry a loaded nine millimeter with a 15
shot capacity at all time on your person plus two spare magazines. Well,
that's your new religion. We can call it the, how about, let's see, what's a good word? Christian
crusaders. Yeah, that's a good, gee, how'd I come up with that? Yeah, how about we use a biblical
verse to back it up where Jesus, when he told his disciples,
And he said, but now he that hath a purse, let him take it and likewise his script.
And he that has no sword, let him sell his garment and buy one. Yeah.
Well, considering the sword was the sidearm of the day of, in the days of Christ and in those days
of Roman antiquity, that was pretty much the equivalent of the Glock back then.
Well, why not? You guys get to carry your ceremonial kirpan,
your ceremonial daggers. We're going to carry our ceremonial nine millimeter glocks. How about
that? Matter of fact, you could even create the glock cult if you want to do.
But I think the mantra should be the cry, the battle cry from Joshua 720,
the sword of the Lord and of Gideon. And let that be the battle cry. Yes,
because. If it's good enough for these people, some of whom are not even citizens of this country,
and they immigrated here illegally. Yeah, in other words, they invaded the country.
If it's good enough for them, it's good enough for us. See, here's the thing.
Here's what we need to understand, people. This is not just a local problem there in Hopkington.
This nation under Biden... allowed these murderous,
raping pieces of trash, who often commit bestiality with farm animals,
let them into the country knowing good and stinking well how violent and nasty and vile they were,
knowing they would do what they were going to do and the things that they are doing now. They come
to this country and openly are declaring themselves enemies of the United States, which,
as far as I'm concerned, would get you booted back out in the ocean. You could swim your happy
little butt back to your sandbox, as far as I'm concerned. They come here and they openly say,
we are going to overthrow the United States, and our government does not a dadgum thing about it.
So, my fellow keepers and bearers, it's time for us to do something about it. All of us carry at
all times. All of you in Tampa who love liberty and adhere to the Constitution,
you know these people are nothing but invading hordes. You need to be armed against it.
So you start arming and you start training and you start looking at these people and judging them
to be the enemies that they are. Don't buddy up with them. Don't try to placate them.
Don't try to be nice to them. Matter of fact, let them know in no uncertain terms. You go ahead and
yank that dagger out. Watch what happens to you. Plug you so full of holes, you could use you for a
colander. That's what they need to hear. I am not your friend if you're a Muslim,
especially if you came here illegally. Now, if you came here to assimilate into our culture,
I don't care what false religion you might practice. Practice it peacefully, and you've got no
quarrel from me. But when your religion tells you to rape our daughters,
rape our sons, rape our wives, kill them, behead them, and so forth.
When you start talking like that, we have every right to arm ourselves in the face of your threats,
and when you become a threat and show yourself to be one, to shoot you down like the filthy,
godless dogs that you are, because that is all you are. Hopefully,
if you own firearms, you've been taking advantage of the zero tax dollar on suppressors.
And yes, I've been definitely taking advantage of that too. And I've been suppressing just about
every carbine in my home. And yeah, I make sure one goes with me every day when I'm going to and
from work. And I've always got something like that on hand in the event that this violence flares
up and I'm not home. and I may have to fight my way home. Now, the reason I brought up suppressors,
it takes me into the last portion of the show. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently said,
and recently ruled, that suppressors are not Second Amendment arms.
Okay. Well, let's look at this for a second, and I'm going to bring out something so... obvious
that people are going to wonder why the courts never thought about this. Because it's funny,
everybody's always trying to find, and I'm speaking in the judicial realm, always trying to find a
reason that something isn't covered by a certain amendment, whether it's First Amendment,
Second Amendment, Fourth Amendment, whatever the case may be. They're always trying to find, say,
well, this isn't covered by that. Well, believe it or not, that doesn't mean the government
automatically has a right to go ahead and infringe it. Okay, here's the article by Duncan Johnson
writing for Ammo Land. The Ninth Circuit just handed gun control lawyers another gift,
and it came from exactly the kind of case Second Amendment advocates would dread,
or should dread, I'm sorry. In United States v. João Ricardo de Borba,
The court upheld a stack of federal gun convictions against a man who was unlawfully in the United
States, had claimed U.S. citizenship on firearm-related paperwork,
was subject to domestic violence no-contact orders as in multiple, and was caught with firearms,
ammunition, and an unregistered suppressor. Bad cases still make law.
And this one may do real damage, said Mr. Johnson. The most dangerous part of the ruling is not
simply that DeBorba lost. Given the facts, that outcome was hardly surprising.
The problem is that the Ninth Circuit went out of its way to say that suppressors, also called
silencers by the ATF, they said that they are not arms protected by the plain text of the Second
Amendment. Okay, you know what? I'm almost ready to agree with that.
They're not really arms. The worst you could do with a suppressor in your hand, if it's not
attached to a firearm, is beat somebody's head in with it. And yeah, it might be pretty handy for
that. But you can't fire rounds through it. You can't cut anybody with it. The only thing it's good
for, unless you've got one of the really lightweight ones, is going upside somebody's head with it.
The article continues. I almost got ahead of myself and started talking about my final point.
The court treated suppressors as optional firearm accessories. Well, this is basically like a
muffler for a vehicle. And said they are not covered because they are not necessary to the ordinary
operation of a firearm. Well, it's hard to disagree with,
I mean. They're not wrong. In other words, because a gun can technically fire without a suppressor,
the court says a suppressor falls outside of the Second Amendment. In other words,
outside of its protections. A suppressor is not some decorative range toy.
It protects hearing, reduces blast, improves communication, helps training,
and makes shooting safer for the shooter and those nearby.
And I agree with that. I like all of my carbines to be suppressed because if I have to use one on
home defense, because no, I do not use a 12 gauge for home defense, it is nowhere near as practical
as a loaded AR-15 suppressed ready to go. I've got all the firepower I might need for any home
invasion in one magazine. Anyway,
it says hunters use them, instructors use them, competitive shooters use them,
ordinary Americans use them. In much of the civilized world, suppressors are treated as basic
safety equipment, not criminal contraband. The Second Amendment does not protect only a stripped
-down firearm in its most primitive form. It protects the right to keep and bear arms in a way that
is useful, effective, and practical. And I agree. Optics help a shooter hit what he's aiming at.
Magazines feed the firearm. Lights help identify a threat. help protect hearing and allow safer
training and defensive use. And I agree. The government has no business,
even if it was just an accessory. Well, and I kind of think it is. It's a muffler.
Nowhere were they given the right to regulate them. Yeah.
Where did they get the right to regulate suppressors? Simply because they weren't firearms?
Then why are they going after them?
I don't know anybody suing to go after foregrips or charging handles.
Oh, charging handles are part of the gun. Or the stocks themselves. Or a forward angled foregrip,
a hand grip on your AR. They're not going after that. They're not going after red dot sights,
which you don't need for your AR-15 to be accurate. You ask any Marine, they're trained to shoot
at 500 yards on iron sights. So red dots, you know, are they not covered by the Second Amendment?
Okay, let's say for a second that accessories are not covered and protected by the Second
Amendment. And, you know, when it really boils down to the brass tacks, I can understand the
principle there. But you show me where the Constitution allows the government to regulate harmless
accessories associated with firearms. Where were they ever given that power,
that authority in the Constitution? The Constitution is a definitive format for our government,
and it also declared in that same document that any power that was not expressly given to the
government was reserved to the states and to the people. These idiots act as though the government
can just ban or control anything and everything as long as there is no explicit prohibition against
them doing so. But that simply is not true, especially according to the 10th Amendment,
which says the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution nor prohibited by it
to the states are reserved to the states, respectively.
or to the people so this begs the question where in the constitution was the federal government
granted the power and the authority to regulate harmless firearm accessories like suppressors or
grips or anything else or red dots especially considering they have no rightful authority to even
regulate the dangerous ones
Yeah, let that sink in for just a second. If they were told in no uncertain terms,
government, you have no authority to infringe the right of the people to keep and bear arms for
war. They don't get to come along and say, yeah, well, that's the pressure you got on there. I can
ban that. No, you can't. Where do you see that power and that authority granted you in the
Constitution? That power was left to the states or to the people, and we the people don't agree
with you.
Smith's second major point is just as important. This entire mess came from an awful defendant,
and I agree with that. This defendant was not a law-abiding citizen. This defendant was an illegal
alien. This defendant had multiple restraining no-contact orders against him and lied on a federal
forum to obtain... firearms or suppressor, however he got the darn thing. He definitely,
well, if it was unregistered, then he didn't buy it through normal means, okay? But he entered the
country on a tourist visa back in 1999. That expired in 2000, and he never regained any legal
status here whatsoever, and he was never deported. He applied for a Washington concealed carry
license, and when he did, he noted on that form that he was a U.S. citizen,
even though he was not. He also submitted ATF paperwork, and on that ATF paperwork for buying his
gun, he checked the box that he was a U.S. citizen. Yeah, but he had multiple restraining orders
on him, multiple no-contact orders, and one of them claimed explicitly on the document,
that he was a credible threat to the physical safety of the person being protected by that order.
So, this guy was not exactly a shining example of a keeper and bearer who's simply fighting for his
rights. And I can't prove it yet, but something tells me that there was some leftist skullduggery
afoot that maybe brought this case. I don't know yet. But anyway, it certainly...
sets a bad precedent and not only that this uh this garbage here is giving the leftists all the
fodder they need to say see there well the ninth circuit said that suppressors aren't covered and
therefore you can't have them well nowhere in the constitution does it say the government has any
right to regulate them how about that and yet they do you see it's amazing how much they how much
power they claim the federal government has when there's nothing written in our supreme law that
claims they have some of the power that these people say they have. And that's a problem. But they
still think, and I remember hearing Nancy Pelosi claim this, that she said, well, whatever the
Constitution doesn't forbid us from doing, we can go ahead and do. No. You can only work within the
parameters of the supreme law. So where'd you get that crap from, lady? Oh,
yeah. From her demented, twisted, communist mind. That's where.
That woman, I tell you what, she is crazier than a sprayed roach. You look at her.
She appears to be drunk half of her life anyway. I tell you what. But I wonder how she would feel.
If she got word from that Massachusetts community, that Massachusetts school district that said,
all of these illegal alien kids, as long as they identify by this particular religion,
they can carry a dangerous weapon to school. Oh, you American kids can't do that.
I know good and well what she would say. She would say, oh, look how they're respecting the
religious rights of those kids. Meanwhile, the Ten Commandments are not...
able to be posted in the classroom.
Because these people think that if there is no prohibition against what they do, if there's no
expressed prohibition, that they can just go ahead and seize that power and do what they want and
declare suppressors to be not covered by the Second Amendment and whatever. Well, even if they're
not, it doesn't freaking matter. Nowhere in the Constitution were you given the right to tell us we
can't put hearing protectors on our guns, devices to protect our hearing, not to mention greatly
reduced blast wave in tight quarters. If you've ever run an AR-15 unsuppressed in a shoot house,
I will tell you what, you better have the foamy earplugs in your ears on top of your earmuffs,
because other than that, it might make your ears bleed because of the concussive blast wave.
Suppressors greatly reduce that. So you're going to try to tell us that we're not allowed to
because the government decided that it's not covered by the Second Amendment? It's something that
works with conjunction with our arms. If the military has suppressors,
and they do, then we have the right to them too. If our enemies who have...
you know, slithered into our country have the right to carry knives at school. Our kids have the
right to carry knives at school too. What's good for the goose, it's good for the gander. Stay in
contact with your reps, stay armed up, stay trained up. My friends in the Tampa area,
you better start carrying and you better start thinking about how you may have to deal with
multiple attackers. You better start considering that right now. You better start forming
neighborhood groups. And you better start thinking about this because it's coming. They've already
boldly proclaimed that they're going to overthrow this country. It's going to be up to us to stop
them from doing that because our government isn't doing a darn thing to help. All right, stay
strapped or stay clapped or not stay clapped, stay strapped or get clapped. And I will catch you on
the next episode. And never forget, incoming rounds always have the right of way. Royce out.